Friday, February 18, 2011

It Revolutionizes It

When the iPad came out, I struggled to see why everyone was calling it "revolutionary."
When I asked a few of the 15 million iPad owners, the best answer I heard was, "It revolutionizes it."
(Check out Jake and Amir's video about the iPad):
While I am still not completely sold that one day the iPad will replace laptops, apps like The DailyPulse and Flipboard have allowed me to see the tremendous power the iPad has to revolutionize the way people consume their news.

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of News Corporation, recently revealed his newest business venture - The Daily - the first iPad only daily news publication.
Here's a quote from a press release on The Daily's website:
"The Daily is a first-of-its-kind daily national news publication built exclusively as an application for tablet computing.  It provides readers the engaging experience of a magazine combined with the immediacy of the web and the need-to-know content of a newspaper, all while elevating user experience beyond the printed word." 
Having only checked out The Daily once or twice, I cannot say that I was personally impressed with the actual product, however, I do believe that it has the potential to change both print and online news publications.  The Daily offers everything a regular paper does (news, sports, celebrity gossip, opinion, arts and life, and so on).  However, unlike most newspapers, which tend to sport a specific political preference, The Daily offers opinion pieces from all sides of the political spectrum.  Offering multiple viewpoints in a single publication is perhaps the best way to solve the issue of bias in the media.

I do not believe that "objective journalism" is possible.  It is simply impossible and unreasonable for us to expect journalists to be able to remain completely objective. After all, they are just human.  That is why I believe that it is extremely important to read multiple viewpoints and not just read one newspaper, or watch one news channel.
However, most people do not have the time to pick up 5 different papers and read each of them and then form their own opinion.  A simple solution to this problem, is not to expect journalists to be objective, but rather we need to introduce diversity of opinions into the newsroom. By supplying people with differing beliefs on a single issue, the unrealistic struggle of remaining impartial is neutralized.  Coupled with the iPad, which allows people to both share and receive news faster than we've ever seen before, apps like The Daily which offer a variety of political viewpoints, will hopefully lead journalism in a new and more realistic direction.

While the iPad does seem to be revolutionizing the media, I am still not so sure it is as revolutionary as everyone may think...

2 comments:

  1. I definitely agree that having multiple news sources in one location is the best way to get around the fact that it’s impossible to have objective journalism.
    I wanted to comment on the video- let’s say the I-pad was a presidential candidate. I can image this same conversation occurring between two people arguing over why they like him or her. In other words, a person might vehemently love a candidate because they’re a great speaker and portrays classic Americanism, but if you were to ask them to tell you some of the candidate’s issues they wouldn’t necessarily be able to.
    Recall the video we watched in class with Chris Mathews saying he gets a feeling up his leg when he hears Obama speak, and that Obama, “Speaks about America in a way that has nothing to do with Politics.” That’s kind of like saying, “It revolutionizes it,” without actually knowing what it does. It’s interesting what good marketing can make a person think they want- and how good political campaigning can make a person like a candidate despite not knowing where they stand on many integral issues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. During the elections, Howard Stern sent a reporter to Harlem to ask people who they were voting for. All the interviews he aired featured voters who supported Obama. The reporter then attributed McCain's views to Obamas, and the answers people gave were...well I'll let you decided what you think.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU&feature=related

    ReplyDelete